The Jammu and Kashmir government’s statement in assembly that there is no proposal to waive off Kissan Credit Card (KCC) loans for farmers has left many in the agrarian community disheartened. While the administration has cited ongoing relief measures and insurance-based compensation, these efforts fall short of addressing the deep and repeated distress suffered by farmers over the years. Agriculture in J&K has been battling adversity on multiple fronts, erratic weather, recurring floods, prolonged dry spells, and frequent highway closures that disrupt the transport of produce. This year has been particularly harsh, with extensive damage to crops, orchards, and livestock. Many farmers are now struggling under mounting debt, as their incomes shrink while interest on KCC loans continues to accumulate. The government’s submission of a Rs 209 crore damage assessment to the Ministry of Home Affairs and disbursement of over Rs 6.4 crore in relief under the SDRF are commendable steps. However, these measures offer only short-term relief. Compensation under schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) is often delayed and rarely reflects the real scale of loss. In many cases, bureaucratic processes like Crop Cutting Experiments (CCEs) slow down the delivery of aid, leaving farmers in prolonged uncertainty. A targeted KCC loan waiver, therefore, deserves serious consideration. It would not be an act of populism but one of pragmatic compassion, offering breathing space to those who have faced consecutive years of devastation. A carefully structured waiver, limited to small and marginal farmers and backed by verified loss data, could provide meaningful support without undermining financial discipline. Agriculture remains the backbone of J&K’s rural economy and a stabilizing force in the region’s social fabric. When farmers repeatedly suffer losses of unimaginable magnitude through no fault of their own, policy responses must extend beyond technical remedies to humane action. Reconsidering a KCC loan waiver would be a step toward rebuilding trust, sustaining livelihoods, and reaffirming that governance, at its core, is about protecting people, not just balancing accounts.






































































